# MCRO DISCOVERY FRAUD — MASTER FILING CATALOG (TRIMMED)

**Case:** 27-CR-23-1886 — *State of Minnesota v. Matthew David Guertin*
**Related Civil Case:** 27-MH-PR-23-815 (Civil Commitment)
**Related Federal Case:** 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM — *Guertin v. Hennepin County*
**Court:** MN 4th Judicial District Court, Hennepin County; U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
**Purpose:** Condensed reference catalog optimized for LLM context windows. Each filing retains key structured fields and a narrative summary sufficient to understand the legal arguments and forensic claims. For full detail on any filing, refer to the unabridged Master Filing Catalog.
**Total Filings:** 28
**Date Range:** January 5, 2024 — May 3, 2025
**Last Updated:** 2025-03-06

---

## FILING CATALOG

### FILING #1

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Demand_or_Request_for_Discovery_2024-01-05_20240430072353.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | January 5, 2024 (filed stamp: 1/5/2024 4:25 AM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Demand or Request for Discovery |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se, listed address: 4385 Trenton Ln N #202, Plymouth, MN 55442) |
| **Pages** | 1 |

**Summary:** This is a formal written discovery request from Guertin directly to prosecutor Jacqueline Perez, citing Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 9. It requests four specific categories of materials: (1) all Brady material, (2) squad video, (3) audio tapes, and (4) all 104 police photographs referenced in Dr. Jill Rogstad's "Confidential Forensic Evaluation Report" — specifically photographs taken by the Minnetonka Police Department of 10233 West 34th Street #304 on January 21, 2023. Guertin explicitly requests the photographs in their original, non-compressed digital file format.

**Key Flags:** Forensic Flags

---

### FILING #2

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Motion_2024-04-04_20240430072350.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | April 4, 2024 (filed stamp: 4/4/2024 7:25 AM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Motion to Compel Discovery + Affidavit of Fact |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se) |
| **Pages** | 40 |

**Summary:** This is the central and most substantive filing in this batch — a 40-page Motion to Compel Discovery accompanied by an Affidavit of Fact (Exhibit Af) and 13 supporting exhibits (A through M, plus Lb). It alleges that the discovery materials provided to Guertin on August 3, 2023 (via email from then-defense counsel Michael Biglow) were fraudulent and manipulated.

**Key Flags:** Core Allegations • Missing photographs • Systematic image cropping/manipulation • Duplicate image disguised as unique • Image rotation confirmed via lens distortion analysis

---

### FILING #3

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Correspondence_2024-05-03_20240503153904.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | May 3, 2024 (filed stamp: 5/3/2024 11:28 AM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 (also references 27-MH-PR-23-815) |
| **Filing Type** | Correspondence (formal follow-up letter) |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (address now: 1075 Traditions Ct., Chaska, MN 55318) |
| **Pages** | 3 |

**Summary:** Formal follow-up letter to the court, filed exactly one month after the April 3-4, 2024 motions (Motion for Judicial Notice, Motion to Compel Discovery, Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records). Guertin states that as of one month later, none of these three motions have been acknowledged by the court or by defense counsel (Bruce Rivers, who has now replaced Biglow). He emphasizes:

1. Despite being found "incompetent to stand trial" and "unable to understand the nature of the charges," the court still has an obligation to process properly filed motions, citing multiple subdivisions of MN Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 9.01 and Rule 13(a) of the Special Rules of Procedure for the MN Commitment and Treatment Acts.

**Key Flags:** Forensic Flags

---

### FILING #4

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Notice_of_Appeal_2024-05-10_20240516110657.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | May 10, 2024 (filed stamp: 5/10/2024 4:42 PM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 → Court of Appeals case A24-0780 |
| **Filing Type** | Petition for Discretionary Review (Notice of Appeal) |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se) |
| **Pages** | 21 |

**Summary:** This is a comprehensive 21-page petition to the Minnesota Court of Appeals under Minn. R. Crim. P.

**Key Flags:** Issue 1 — Fraud on the Court by the Court Itself • Issue 2 — Involvement of External Entities • Issue 3 — Refusal to Provide Discovery and Medical Records • Issue 4 — Impartiality Concerns / Circular Handling • Issue 5 — Complete Lack of Representation / Potential Coercion of Defense Counsel

---

### FILING #5

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Other_Document_2024-05-15_20240516111053.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | May 15, 2024 (filed stamp: 5/15/2024 11:46 AM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 → Court of Appeals case A24-0780 |
| **Filing Type** | Petitioner's Addendum 2 (appellate addendum) |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se) |
| **Pages** | 43 (Addendum pages Add. 1 through Add. 43) |

**Summary:** This is Petitioner's Addendum 2 to the Petition for Discretionary Review (Filing #4, case A24-0780). It packages two previously filed district court documents for the Court of Appeals record:

**Key Flags:** Part 1 — April 4, 2024 Motion to Compel Discovery and Affidavit of Fact (Add. 1–40) • Part 2 — May 3, 2024 Correspondence / Follow-Up Letter (Add. 41–43) • Forensic Flags

---

### FILING #6

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Other_Document_2024-05-15_20240516111114.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | May 15, 2024 (filed stamp: 5/15/2024 11:46 AM; originally filed to district court 5/3/2024 2:56 PM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 → Court of Appeals case A24-0780 |
| **Filing Type** | Petitioner's Addendum 3 (appellate addendum) — Affidavit of Fact / MCRO Data Analysis |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address: 1075 Traditions Ct., Chaska, MN 55318, Carver County) |
| **Pages** | 31 (Addendum pages Add. 1 through Add. 31) |

**Summary:** This is Petitioner's Addendum 3 — a 31-page sworn Affidavit of Fact presenting a data-driven analysis of MCRO (Minnesota Court Records Online) records. Originally filed in district court on May 3, 2024 at 2:56 PM (same day as Filing #3 correspondence, but filed separately at a later time), it was then re-filed as an appellate addendum on May 15, 2024 for case A24-0780. This is the most technically sophisticated filing in the catalog — Guertin used Python scripting and Selenium-based browser automation to systematically download and analyze 3,556 MCRO PDF documents across 163 unique criminal case IDs.

**Key Flags:** Methodology • Core Dataset • Exhibit A — Shared Judicial Assignments to Cases (Add. 6–20, 15 pages) • Exhibit B — Circular Handling Analysis (Add. 21–27, 7 pages) • Exhibit C — Incompetency Orders Analysis (Add. 28–31, 4 pages)

---

### FILING #7

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Correspondence_2024-06-03_20240604132619.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | June 3, 2024 (filed stamp: 6/3/2024 7:41 AM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Correspondence (brief follow-up letter) |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin |
| **Pages** | 1 |

**Summary:** Brief one-page letter following up on all previous discovery requests and the motion to compel. States that despite "multiple formal requests and a motion to compel discovery," he has still not received the necessary discovery materials. Notes this significantly impairs his ability to prepare for trial and violates his right to due process. References having filed a motion for substitute counsel and a renewed motion to compel discovery (both filed the same day, June 3, 2024).

**Key Flags:** Forensic Flags

---

### FILING #8

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Motion_2024-06-03_20240603092053.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | June 3, 2024 (filed stamp: 6/3/2024 7:33 AM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Motion for Substitute Counsel |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address: 1075 Traditions Ct., Chaska, MN 55318) |
| **Pages** | 4 |

**Summary:** Formal motion requesting the court appoint substitute counsel to replace Bruce Rivers. Specifically references the Petition for Discretionary Review filed in the Court of Appeals (case A24-0780) as containing "compelling and irrefutable evidence" of ineffective assistance. Enumerates four categories of failure by Rivers, with specific docket index references:

1. **Failure to provide discovery materials and the Jan 3, 2024 Rule 20.01 exam report** — References Index #30 pp.

**Key Flags:** Forensic Flags

---

### FILING #9

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Notice_of_Motion_and_Motion_2024-06-03_20240603092040.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | June 3, 2024 (filed stamp: 6/3/2024 7:37 AM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Notice of Motion and Motion (Renewed Motion to Compel Discovery) |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address: 1075 Traditions Ct., Chaska, MN 55318) |
| **Pages** | 5 |

**Summary:** This is a formal renewed Motion to Compel Discovery filed the same day as the Motion for Substitute Counsel (Filing #6) and the follow-up correspondence (Filing #5). It is a streamlined, legally structured version of the original April 4, 2024 motion (Filing #2), now condensed to 5 pages and framed as a Notice of Motion under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure. The motion opens with an Introduction section reciting the procedural history: (1) formal discovery request to prosecutor Perez on January 5, 2024 (Index #22), (2) pro se Motion to Compel Discovery and Affidavit of Fact on April 4, 2024 (Index #29) highlighting the State's failure and detailing fraudulent alterations, and (3) follow-up correspondence on May 3, 2024 (Index #36) reiterating need for materials.

**Key Flags:** Forensic Flags

---

### FILING #10

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `00__Guertin-v-Hennepin-County-0_24-cv-02646__2025-02-12.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | Case filed July 8, 2024; docket retrieved February 12, 2025 (per filename) |
| **Case ID** | 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM (U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota) |
| **Filing Type** | Complete Federal Case Docket Sheet (CourtListener extract) |
| **Filed By** | N/A — court record / reference document |
| **Pages** | 21 (covering 96 docket entries) |

**Summary:** This is the complete docket sheet for the federal civil rights action *Guertin v. Hennepin County*, Case 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM, obtained from CourtListener.com. The docket covers 96 entries spanning July 8, 2024 through November 13, 2024. This is the §1983 federal lawsuit Guertin filed after exhausting (and being ignored on) his state-court discovery and procedural motions documented in Filings #1–#9 of this catalog.

**Key Flags:** Case Initiation (July 8, 2024) • Exhibits Filed (July 12–16, 2024) • TRO Denied (July 16, 2024) • Defendants Appear and Move to Dismiss (July 26 – August 2, 2024) • Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Discovery Fraud (August 7, 2024)

---

### FILING #11

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `02__EXHIBIT-R__ORIGINAL-MOTION-FOR-EMERGENCY-TRO__DIGITAL.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | July 16, 2024 (digital refiling of paper original filed July 8, 2024) |
| **Case ID** | 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM (ECF No. 25); references 27-CR-23-1886 and 27-MH-PR-23-815 |
| **Filing Type** | Exhibit R — Digital version of Emergency Motion for TRO and Immediate Hearing, with attached state-court exhibits |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address listed as both 1075 Traditions Ct., Chaska, MN 55318 and earlier Plymouth address) |
| **Pages** | 46 |

**Summary:** This is ECF No. 25 in the federal case — a digital refiling of Guertin's original paper Emergency Motion for TRO and Immediate Hearing that was hand-delivered to initiate the case on July 8, 2024. The digital version restores bookmarks, hyperlinks, and searchability lost in the paper filing process. It contains the TRO motion itself (7 pages) plus 39 pages of attached exhibits drawn from the state criminal and civil commitment case records.

**Key Flags:** TRO Motion Body (pp. 1–9 of Exhibit R) • Attached State-Court Exhibits (pp. 10–46) • Key People Referenced (new to this filing or with new detail) • Forensic Flags • Rogstad Report Metadata — "GuzmanC" authorship

---

### FILING #12

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `42__GUERTINS-MOTION-FOR-EXPEDITED-PRELIMINARY-INJUNCTION.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | August 7, 2024 |
| **Case ID** | 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM (U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota) — related to state criminal case 27-CR-23-1886 and civil commitment case 27-MH-PR-23-815 |
| **Filing Type** | Emergency Motion for Expedited Preliminary Injunction and Immediate Judicial Intervention |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address: 1075 Traditions Ct., Chaska, MN 55318; phone: 763-221-4540; email: MattGuertin@protonmail.com) |
| **Pages** | 89 |

**Summary:** This is the most comprehensive single filing in the catalog — an 89-page emergency motion for preliminary injunction filed in federal court (Doc. 42 in case 24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM). It is filed in response to discovery materials provided to Guertin by Bruce Rivers on July 16, 2024, following a review hearing. The motion synthesizes the full scope of Guertin's discovery fraud claims, patent fraud allegations, surveillance evidence, psychological evaluation challenges, and defense counsel complaints into a single document seeking immediate federal intervention to prevent forced commitment and antipsychotic medication.

**Key Flags:** Section II — Evidence of Discovery Fraud (pp. 4–17) • Manipulated and Missing Images (¶¶ 21–24) • Forensic Analysis and AI Manipulation (¶¶ 25–26) • Chain of Custody (¶¶ 27–28) • Obscured Laptop Screen (¶¶ 34–40)

---

### FILING #13

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `43__EXHIBIT-S__NEW-EVIDENCE-AND-EMAIL-COMMUNICATIONS.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | August 7, 2024 (ECF stamp: 08/07/24) |
| **Filing Type** | Exhibit S — Newly Obtained Evidence and Email Communications (supporting follow-up motion for in-person hearing and preliminary injunction) |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se) |
| **Pages** | 196 |

**Summary:** This is the largest and most comprehensive single exhibit in the catalog to date — a 196-page compilation of newly obtained evidence and email communications filed as Exhibit S to Doc. 43 in Guertin's federal civil rights case. The exhibit is organized into 13 indexed sections, each bookmarked for navigation, and is submitted to support a follow-up motion requesting an in-person hearing and preliminary injunction. Guertin argues that the newly analyzed evidence substantiates his original claims of fraudulent discovery materials and demonstrates a substantial risk of irreparable harm due to deceptive exam reports and the continuing deprivation of his constitutional rights.

**Key Flags:** Core Content by Index Section • Index 01 (7 pages) — July 25, 2024, Email Chain with Bruce Rivers (Emails 1 & 2) • Index 02 (3 pages) — Presentation of Missing Notebook Photos • Index 03 (4 pages) — July 25, 2024, Email 3 to Bruce Rivers — Mathematical Probability Analysis • Index 04 (3 pages) — 'Rivers-Discovery-Missing-Images.pdf' — Complete Comparison Table

---

### FILING #14

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `44__EXHIBIT-T__FRAUDULENT-DISCOVERY-ANALYSIS__1-of-3.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | August 7, 2024 (filed stamp: Doc. 44 Filed 08/07/24) |
| **Case ID** | 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM (federal civil case; underlying criminal case 27-CR-23-1886) |
| **Filing Type** | Exhibit T — Forensic Analysis of Discovery Photographs (Part 1 of 3) |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se) |
| **Pages** | 21 |

**Summary:** This is Part 1 of a three-part forensic image analysis exhibit filed as Doc. 44 in the federal civil case 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM. It constitutes Exhibit T of the filing and presents Guertin's forensic analysis of a **second set** of discovery photographs — distinct from the August 3, 2023 discovery set analyzed in Filing #2 (the original 80-image set). These photographs were provided to Guertin by defense attorney Bruce Rivers following Rivers' July 16, 2024 1:30 PM court appearance.

**Key Flags:** Core Allegation • Methodology (Three-Layered Analysis) • Color Curve Enhancement • Overlay Technique • Visual Inspection and PNG Mask Analysis

---

### FILING #15

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `45__EXHIBIT-U__FRAUDULENT-DISCOVERY-ANALYSIS__2-of-3.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | August 7, 2024 (filed stamp: 08/07/24) |
| **Case ID** | 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM (federal civil case; underlying criminal case 27-CR-23-1886) |
| **Filing Type** | Exhibit U — Forensic Image Analysis (Part 2 of 3), attached to Doc. 45 |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se) |
| **Pages** | 12 (Exhibit pages 1–10 plus cover page and title page) |

**Summary:** This is Part 2 of a three-part forensic image analysis exhibit filed as Exhibit U to Doc. 45 in the federal civil case 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM. It documents Guertin's color curve analysis of discovery photographs he received from defense counsel Bruce Rivers following a July 16, 2024 court appearance at 1:30 PM. Guertin characterizes these as the "July 16, 2024 Discovery Materials" — a distinct set from the August 3, 2023 discovery PDF analyzed in the April 4, 2024 Motion to Compel (Filing #2).

**Key Flags:** Methodology — Color Curve Analysis • Photographs Analyzed • Core Forensic Claim • Forensic Flags • Second discovery production analyzed

---

### FILING #16

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `46__EXHIBIT-V__FRAUDULENT-DISCOVERY-ANALYSIS__3-of-3.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | August 7, 2024 (ECF stamp: Filed 08/07/24) |
| **Case ID** | 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM (federal civil case, D. Minn.); underlying state case 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Exhibit V — Forensic Analysis of Fraudulent Discovery Materials (Part 3 of 3: Control Group + Complete Metadata) |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se plaintiff in federal civil action) |
| **Pages** | 70 |

**Summary:** This is Exhibit V to Doc. 46 in the federal civil case 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM, constituting Part 3 of a three-part forensic analysis of what Guertin alleges are fraudulent discovery photographs from the state criminal case 27-CR-23-1886. Parts 1 and 2 are contained in Exhibits S, T, and U (not in this batch). Exhibit V serves two specific purposes: (1) providing a control group of discovery images that Guertin contends are NOT manipulated, for visual comparison against the allegedly manipulated images presented in the prior exhibits, and (2) presenting the complete EXIF metadata output (via ExifTool v12.40) for every image examined across all four exhibits (S, T, U, and V).

**Key Flags:** Index 01 — Control Group (pp. 3–10, 8 pages) • Index 02 — Complete Image Metadata (pp. 11–70, 60 pages) • Cross-Image Metadata Consistency (derived from Index 02) • Notable Metadata Variations • Forensic Flags

---

### FILING #17

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `54__PLAINTIFFS-RESPONSE-TO-DEFENDANTS-MOTIONS-TO-DISMISS.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | August 14, 2024 |
| **Case ID** | 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM (Federal Civil Rights Action) |
| **Filing Type** | Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. 54) |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address: 1075 Traditions Ct., Chaska, MN 55318) |
| **Pages** | 11 |

**Summary:** This is Guertin's consolidated response to motions to dismiss filed by all defendants except Bruce Rivers, who had failed to respond to the complaint. The filing is structured around two central pillars: (1) newly obtained discovery materials received from Bruce Rivers on July 16, 2024, which Guertin argues validate his original fraud claims, and (2) the discrediting of the Rule 20.01 psychological evaluation reports used by defendants to justify their motions.

**Key Flags:** Section II — Discovery Fraud and Validation of Initial Claims • Direct Correlation Between Initial and New Discovery Materials • Laptop Screen Anomalies (Exhibit I reference) • Civil Conspiracy and Involvement of Defendants • Validation of Monell Claims

---

### FILING #18

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `68__PLAINTIFFS-MEMORANDUM-IN-OPPOSITION-TO-STATE-DEFENDANTS-MOTION-TO-DISMISS.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | August 27, 2024 (filed stamp: 8/27/24) |
| **Case ID** | 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM (ECF No. 68) |
| **Filing Type** | Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address: 1075 Traditions Ct., Chaska, MN 55318) |
| **Pages** | 5 |

**Summary:** This is a targeted 5-page memorandum opposing the State Defendants' motion to dismiss and their opposition to Guertin's motion for preliminary injunction. The filing is more legally structured than Filing #12, focusing on three core arguments: discovery fraud as validation of conspiracy claims, the competency paradox, and case law supporting federal injunctive relief despite the Anti-Injunction Act.

**Key Flags:** Section II — Fraudulent Discovery and Core Conspiracy • Section III — Competency Paradox and Perverse Incentives • Section IV — Case Law Supporting Injunctive Relief • Forensic Flags

---

### FILING #19

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `73__PLAINTIFFS-MEMORANDUM-IN-OPPOSITION-TO-HENNEPIN-COUNTY-DEFENDANTS-MOTION-TO-DISMISS.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | September 2, 2024 (filed stamp: 9/02/24) |
| **Case ID** | 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM (ECF No. 73) |
| **Filing Type** | Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Hennepin County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address: 1075 Traditions Ct., Chaska, MN 55318) |
| **Pages** | 8 |

**Summary:** This is an 8-page memorandum opposing the Hennepin County Defendants' motion to dismiss. It is more detailed than Filing #13, addressing county-specific arguments (Monell liability, service of process, Rule 8(a) compliance, pro se amendment rights) in addition to the shared discovery fraud and case law arguments.

**Key Flags:** Section II — Fraudulent Discovery and Core Conspiracy • Section III — Continued Indifference by Hennepin County Defendants • Section IV — Case Law Supporting Injunctive Relief • Section V — Service Waiver • Section VI — Rule 8(a) Compliance

---

### FILING #20

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `74__EXHIBIT-Y__GUERTINS-COMPETENCY-AND-DEFENDANTS-INCOMPETENCY.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | September 2, 2024 (filed stamp: 9/02/24) |
| **Case ID** | 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM (ECF No. 74) |
| **Filing Type** | Exhibit Y — Guertin's Competency and Defendants' Incompetency |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se) |
| **Pages** | 7 (Exhibit Y, pp. 1–5 of exhibit content plus cover page and final page) |

**Summary:** This exhibit is submitted as evidence of Guertin's legal competency and strategic reasoning capability. It consists of a cover page summarizing three key points, followed by a multi-page conversation between Guertin and ChatGPT in which Guertin lays out his strategic analysis of the discovery fraud "catch-22" and ChatGPT confirms the logical validity of his position.

**Key Flags:** Cover Page Summary (p. 2) • ChatGPT Conversation (pp. 3–7) • Forensic Flags

---

### FILING #21

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `122__Exhibit-List_A-E__Discovery-Fraud-Proven__2025-02-28.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | February 28, 2025 (filed stamp: 2/28/2025 4:36 PM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Defendant's Supplemental Evidence Submission in Support of Objection to Competency Report |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address: 4385 Trenton Ln. N 202, Plymouth, MN 55442; phone: 763-221-4540; email: MattGuertin@protonmail.com; website: www.MattGuertin.com) |
| **Pages** | 75 |

**Summary:** This is a 75-page supplemental evidence submission filed pro se by Guertin in support of his objection to the competency report. It is the culmination of the discovery fraud thread that runs through the entire catalog — the filing presents what Guertin characterizes as conclusive proof that the February 13, 2025 discovery images provided by the Hennepin County Public Defender's Office (via OneDrive) were manipulated from the original August 3, 2023 discovery set. The filing serves a dual purpose: (1) substantiating the discovery fraud claim with visual, dimensional, and metadata evidence across five exhibits, and (2) arguing that the filing itself demonstrates Guertin's competence to stand trial under Minn.

**Key Flags:** Core Allegations and Evidence • Manipulated Image Aspect Ratios (Exhibit A) • Fraudulent "Squishing" Process (Exhibit A) • OneDrive Metadata Tampering (Exhibit A, pp. 4–6) • Chain of Custody via OneDrive (Exhibit D)

---

### FILING #22

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `123__Exhibit-List_F-J____Discovery-Fraud-Proven__2025-02-28.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | February 28, 2025 (filed stamp: 2/28/2025 4:38 PM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Defendant's Supplemental Evidence Submission in Support of Objection to Competency Report - B |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address: 4385 Trenton Ln. N 202, Plymouth, MN 55442; Tel: 763-221-4540; Email: MattGuertin@protonmail.com; Web: www.MattGuertin.com) |
| **Pages** | 92 (4 pages motion body + 88 pages exhibits) |

**Summary:** This is a 92-page filing presenting five forensic image analysis reports (Exhibits F through J) as supplemental evidence supporting Guertin's objection to his competency report. The filing is the most technically advanced image forensic submission in the catalog — each exhibit uses distinct mathematical and geometric methodologies to demonstrate that specific discovery photographs have been altered through non-uniform horizontal compression (x-axis squishing). The filing serves a dual purpose: (1) proving discovery image manipulation, and (2) arguing that Guertin's ability to commission, comprehend, and present these forensic analyses is itself evidence of his competency under Minn.

**Key Flags:** Core Structure • Analytical Methodology Across All Five Exhibits • Shared Source File Links (per-exhibit) • Forensic Flags • Critical new discovery batch identified

---

### FILING #23

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `124__Exhibit-List_K-L____Discovery-Fraud-Proven__2025-02-28.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | February 28, 2025 (filed stamp: 2/28/2025 4:40 PM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Defendant's Supplemental Evidence Submission in Support of Objection to Competency Report - C |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address: 4385 Trenton Ln. N 202, Plymouth, MN 55442) |
| **Pages** | 76 (4 pp. motion body + 46 pp. Exhibit K + 26 pp. Exhibit L) |

**Summary:** This is a 76-page supplemental forensic evidence submission incorporating two new exhibits (K and L). The filing serves a dual purpose: (1) presenting advanced image forensic analyses demonstrating that key discovery images have been manipulated, and (2) arguing that Guertin's ability to conduct and present these analyses is itself proof of competency under Minn. R. Crim.

**Key Flags:** Core Arguments • Competency Under Minn. R. Crim. P. 20.01 • Evidentiary Integrity and Discovery Fraud • Pretrial Disclosure and Fairness • Relief Sought

---

### FILING #24

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `Guertin__Matthew_-_March_5__2024.pdf` |
| **Actual Date of Hearing** | **March 5, 2025** (filename and header read "March 5, 2024" — confirmed misdated; see Provenance Note below) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Official Court Transcript — Contested Competency Hearing |
| **Pages** | 61 |

**Summary:** This is a 61-page verbatim transcript of a contested competency hearing held before Judge William H. Koch in Hennepin County Probate Mental Health Court. The hearing was the third occasion on which the court considered Guertin's competency to stand trial on four felony firearms counts (one count reckless discharge of a firearm within a municipality; three counts possession of a firearm without a serial number). Two prior findings of incompetence had been entered: July 13, 2023, and January 17, 2024.

**Key Flags:** Procedural Background Established on the Record (pp. 2–3) • Defense Position (pp. 4–9) • State's Position on Testimony (pp. 9–10) • Guertin's Sworn Testimony (pp. 12–56) • Charges

---

### FILING #25

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `131__Pro-Se-Defendants-Motion-to-Dismiss-w-Prejudice__2025-04-16.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | April 16, 2025 (filed stamp: 4/16/2025 3:15 PM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Pro Se Defendant's Motion to Dismiss All Charges with Prejudice |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se for this motion only, while also represented by defense counsel; address: 4385 Trenton Ln. N 202, Plymouth, MN 55442) |
| **Pages** | 50 |

**Summary:** This is the most comprehensive single filing in the catalog — a 50-page pro se motion to dismiss all four pending felony charges with prejudice (one count under Minn. Stat. § 609.66, subd. 1a(a)(3) [firearm discharge], and three counts under Minn.

**Key Flags:** Section I — Introduction (pp. 1–3) • Section II — Factual Background (pp. 3–4) • Section III — Fraudulent Rule 20 Evaluations and Weaponized Psychiatry (pp. 4–24) • The Rogstad Report: Ghostwritten, Biased, and Deliberately Misleading (pp. 4–5) • The Diagnostic Inversion (pp. 5–6)

---

### FILING #26

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `133__Defendants-Petition-to-Proceed-as-Pro-Se-Counsel__2025-04-21.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | April 21, 2025 (filed stamp: 4/21/2025 7:48 AM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Defendant's Petition to Proceed as Pro Se Counsel |
| **Filed By** | Matthew David Guertin (pro se; address: 4385 Trenton Ln. N 202, Plymouth, MN 55442; phone: 763-221-4540; email: MattGuertin@protonmail.com; web: MattGuertin.com) |
| **Pages** | 110 (32 pp. petition body + Table of Authorities + 3 exhibits: Exhibit A ~24 pp., Exhibit B 4 pp., Exhibit C 50 pp.) |

**Summary:** This is an extraordinarily comprehensive 110-page filing combining a formal Petition to Proceed as Pro Se Counsel (32 pages including Table of Authorities) with three major exhibits that together constitute the most complete single-document articulation of Guertin's case to date. The petition was filed in advance of a scheduled April 29, 2025 hearing at 11:00 AM, set by Judge Hudelston after the April 17, 2025 hearing at which the pro se request first arose. Guertin returns his address to Plymouth (previously Chaska in earlier filings).

**Key Flags:** Section II — Relevant Background and Facts • Section III — Constitutional Right to Self-Representation • Section IV — Denial of Meaningful Defense • Section V — Judicial Paradox: Competency Finding vs. Denial of Voice • Section VI — "Truth-as-Psychosis"

---

### FILING #27

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `134__Transcript_April-17-2025_Hearing__2025-04-23.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | April 23, 2025 (transcript filed; hearing held April 17, 2025 at 9:15 AM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Transcript of Proceedings — Omnibus Hearing |
| **Filed By** | Maya Funk, Official Court Reporter |
| **Pages** | 15 |

**Summary:** This is the official transcript of an omnibus hearing in the state criminal case, held before Judge Sarah Hudleston — a new judicial officer not previously appearing in this catalog. The hearing had been "postponed several times" based on the Rule 20.01 referral and evaluation, and a contested competency hearing had recently resulted in Judge Koch entering a finding of competence. This hearing marks a significant procedural turning point: Guertin has been found competent by Judge Koch, and the case is moving toward potential trial scheduling.

**Key Flags:** Appearances • Key Procedural Developments • Key People Referenced (new to catalog) • Forensic Flags • New judicial officer

---

### FILING #28

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Filename** | `189__Transcript_April-29-2025__2025-05-03.pdf` |
| **Date Filed** | May 3, 2025 (transcript filed; hearing held April 29, 2025 at 11:18 AM) |
| **Case ID** | 27-CR-23-1886 |
| **Filing Type** | Transcript of Proceedings — Continuation of Omnibus Hearing / Self-Representation Petition Hearing |
| **Filed By** | Maya Funk, Official Court Reporter |
| **Pages** | 20 |

**Summary:** This is the most substantive transcript in the catalog — the continuation hearing from Filing #16, where Guertin expected to present his self-representation petition. Instead, Judge Hudleston announces at the outset that she cannot allow Guertin to self-represent and orders a new Rule 20.01 competency evaluation, effectively overriding Judge Koch's recent competency finding. This hearing documents extensive on-the-record dialogue between Guertin and the court, including Guertin's attempt to explain the discovery fraud catch-22 and his MCRO data analysis.

**Key Flags:** Appearances • Key Procedural Developments • Key People Referenced (new to catalog) • Forensic Flags • Judge Koch's competency finding overridden

---

## CHRONOLOGICAL TIMELINE

| # | Date | Filing Type | Document |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024-01-05 | Demand or Request for Discovery | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Demand_or_Request_for_Discovery` |
| 2 | 2024-04-04 | Motion to Compel Discovery + Affidavit of Fact | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Motion_2024-04-04_2024043007235` |
| 3 | 2024-05-03 | Correspondence (formal follow-up letter) | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Correspondence_2024-05-03_20240` |
| 4 | 2024-05-10 | Petition for Discretionary Review (Notice of Appeal) | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Notice_of_Appeal_2024-05-10_202` |
| 5 | 2024-05-15 | Petitioner's Addendum 2 (appellate addendum) | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Other_Document_2024-05-15_20240` |
| 6 | 2024-05-15 | Petitioner's Addendum 3 (appellate addendum) — Affidavit of  | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Other_Document_2024-05-15_20240` |
| 7 | 2024-06-03 | Correspondence (brief follow-up letter) | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Correspondence_2024-06-03_20240` |
| 8 | 2024-06-03 | Motion for Substitute Counsel | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Motion_2024-06-03_2024060309205` |
| 9 | 2024-06-03 | Notice of Motion and Motion (Renewed Motion to Compel Discov | `MCRO_27-CR-23-1886_Notice_of_Motion_and_Motion_202` |
| 10 | 2024-07-08 | Complete Federal Case Docket Sheet (CourtListener extract) | `00__Guertin-v-Hennepin-County-0_24-cv-02646__2025-` |
| 11 | 2024-07-16 | Exhibit R — Digital version of Emergency Motion for TRO and  | `02__EXHIBIT-R__ORIGINAL-MOTION-FOR-EMERGENCY-TRO__` |
| 12 | 2024-08-07 | Emergency Motion for Expedited Preliminary Injunction and Im | `42__GUERTINS-MOTION-FOR-EXPEDITED-PRELIMINARY-INJU` |
| 13 | 2024-08-07 | Exhibit S — Newly Obtained Evidence and Email Communications | `43__EXHIBIT-S__NEW-EVIDENCE-AND-EMAIL-COMMUNICATIO` |
| 14 | 2024-08-07 | Exhibit T — Forensic Analysis of Discovery Photographs (Part | `44__EXHIBIT-T__FRAUDULENT-DISCOVERY-ANALYSIS__1-of` |
| 15 | 2024-08-07 | Exhibit U — Forensic Image Analysis (Part 2 of 3), attached  | `45__EXHIBIT-U__FRAUDULENT-DISCOVERY-ANALYSIS__2-of` |
| 16 | 2024-08-07 | Exhibit V — Forensic Analysis of Fraudulent Discovery Materi | `46__EXHIBIT-V__FRAUDULENT-DISCOVERY-ANALYSIS__3-of` |
| 17 | 2024-08-14 | Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. | `54__PLAINTIFFS-RESPONSE-TO-DEFENDANTS-MOTIONS-TO-D` |
| 18 | 2024-08-27 | Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to State Defendants' Mo | `68__PLAINTIFFS-MEMORANDUM-IN-OPPOSITION-TO-STATE-D` |
| 19 | 2024-09-02 | Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Hennepin County Defe | `73__PLAINTIFFS-MEMORANDUM-IN-OPPOSITION-TO-HENNEPI` |
| 20 | 2024-09-02 | Exhibit Y — Guertin's Competency and Defendants' Incompetenc | `74__EXHIBIT-Y__GUERTINS-COMPETENCY-AND-DEFENDANTS-` |
| 21 | 2025-02-28 | Defendant's Supplemental Evidence Submission in Support of O | `122__Exhibit-List_A-E__Discovery-Fraud-Proven__202` |
| 22 | 2025-02-28 | Defendant's Supplemental Evidence Submission in Support of O | `123__Exhibit-List_F-J____Discovery-Fraud-Proven__2` |
| 23 | 2025-02-28 | Defendant's Supplemental Evidence Submission in Support of O | `124__Exhibit-List_K-L____Discovery-Fraud-Proven__2` |
| 24 | 2025-03-05 | Official Court Transcript — Contested Competency Hearing | `Guertin__Matthew_-_March_5__2024.pdf` |
| 25 | 2025-04-16 | Pro Se Defendant's Motion to Dismiss All Charges with Prejud | `131__Pro-Se-Defendants-Motion-to-Dismiss-w-Prejudi` |
| 26 | 2025-04-21 | Defendant's Petition to Proceed as Pro Se Counsel | `133__Defendants-Petition-to-Proceed-as-Pro-Se-Coun` |
| 27 | 2025-04-23 | Transcript of Proceedings — Omnibus Hearing | `134__Transcript_April-17-2025_Hearing__2025-04-23.` |
| 28 | 2025-05-03 | Transcript of Proceedings — Continuation of Omnibus Hearing  | `189__Transcript_April-29-2025__2025-05-03.pdf` |

## KEY ENTITIES

| Entity | Role | First Appears |
|---|---|---|
| Matthew David Guertin | Defendant/Plaintiff (pro se) | All filings |
| Jacqueline Perez | ACA / Prosecutor | Filing #1 |
| Michael Biglow | Former defense counsel (fired); signed commitment terms Aug 2023 | Filing #2 (Exhibit A) |
| Bruce Rivers | Defense counsel (seeking replacement); "powerful people" statement; default entered then vacated in federal case | Filing #3 |
| Judge Jay Quam | Judicial officer, state criminal case | Filing #2 |
| Judge Julia Dayton Klein | Judicial officer (issued Apr 12 pro se denial order; one of three analyzed officers) | Filing #3 |
| Judge Michael K Brown | Signs disproportionate share of incompetency orders | Filing #2 (Exhibit E) |
| Dr. Jill Rogstad | Rule 20.01 evaluator (March 10, 2023); report metadata shows "GuzmanC" as author | Filing #2 (Exhibit E) |
| Dr. Michael Robertson | Civil commitment examiner (Aug 1, 2023); "N/A" on competency certification | Filing #2 (Exhibit E) |
| Dr. Adam Milz | 6-month review examiner (Jan 3, 2024); Guertin has video of exam | Filing #2 (Exhibit M) |
| JSF254 | PDF author/creator in discovery metadata | Filing #2 (Exhibit D) |
| Chela Guzman-Weigart | Asst. County Admin, Law Safety & Justice; "GuzmanC" in Rogstad report metadata; CJCC member; defendant in federal case | Filing #4, expanded in #11 |
| Court Referee Danielle C. Mercurio | One of three judicial officers in circular handling analysis; defendant in federal case (individual capacity) | Filing #9 (Exhibit A) |
| Court Referee George Borer | One of three judicial officers in circular handling analysis; defendant in federal case (individual capacity) | Filing #9 (Exhibit A) |
| Kristin Siegesmund | Initiating judge in some analyzed shared cases | Filing #9 (Exhibit B) |
| Hilary Caligiuri | Initiating judge in some analyzed shared cases | Filing #9 (Exhibit B) |
| Judge John R. Tunheim | Presiding federal judge; issued TRO denial, dismissed case under *Younger* | Filing #10 |
| Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan | Originally assigned federal judge; recused July 9, 2024 | Filing #10 |
| Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko | Assigned federal magistrate | Filing #10 |
| Benjamin Harringa | AAG representing state defendants in federal case | Filing #10 |
| Jamil M.F. Masroujeh | ACA representing county defendants in federal case | Filing #10 |
| Matthew Lloyd Robert Messerli | Additional counsel for county defendants in federal case | Filing #10 |
| Daniel J. Cragg | Attorney for Bruce Rivers in federal case | Filing #10 |
| Keith Ellison | MN Attorney General; defendant in federal case (official capacity) | Filing #10 |
| Mary Moriarty | Hennepin County Attorney; defendant in federal case (official capacity); CJCC member | Filing #10 |
| Joel Fisher | Attorney ID# 29579; advised Guertin on Jan 31, 2024 waiver | Filing #11 |
| Referee Lyonel Norris | Found probable cause Jan 25, 2023 | Filing #11 |
| **Officer Brandon Harris** | **Minnetonka Police Department; received Guertin's fraud report Jan 12, 2023 (predates criminal charges)** | **Filing #12** |
| **Judge Sarah Hudleston** | **Presiding judge on 27-CR-23-1886 (2025); denied self-representation; ordered fourth Rule 20.01 evaluation overriding Judge Koch's competency finding** | **Filing #16** |
| **Judge Koch** | **Presided over contested competency hearing; entered finding of competence (subsequently overridden by Hudleston)** | **Filing #16** |
| **Mawerdi Hamid** | **Assistant Hennepin County Attorney; replaced Perez as prosecutor on criminal case** | **Filing #16** |
| **Emmett Donnelly** | **Assistant Hennepin County Public Defender; appointed defense counsel (replaced Rivers); maintained neutral posture on competency** | **Filing #16** |
| **Raissa Carpenter** | **Assistant Hennepin County Public Defender; appointed defense counsel; previously identified in Filing #9 as assigned to 16 allegedly fake MCRO cases; named on the record in Filing #17** | **Filing #16** |
| **Timothy Humphreys** | **Assistant Hennepin County Attorney; co-counsel with Hamid at April 29, 2025 hearing** | **Filing #17** |
| **Maya Funk** | **Official Court Reporter, Fourth Judicial District** | **Filing #16** |
| Judge Sarah Hudelston | Current judicial officer in 27-CR-23-1886 | Filing #13 |
| Dr. Katheryn Cranbrook | Third Rule 20 evaluator (Dec 20, 2024); diagnosed without interview | Filing #13 |
| Judge William Koch | Granted public defender (Oct 1, 2024); issued April 3, 2025 competency finding | Filing #13 |
| Judge Shereen Askalani | Ordered third Rule 20 exam same day she granted public defender (Oct 15, 2024) | Filing #13 |
| Mary F. Moriarty | Hennepin County Attorney | Filing #12 |
| Thomas Manewitz | Assistant Hennepin County Attorney (replaces Perez) | Filing #12 |
| Emmett M. Donnelly | Assistant Public Defender (co-counsel with Carpenter) | Filing #12 |
| JoAnne Van Guilder | Hennepin County staff; controls OneDrive discovery system; "Modified By" on all 104 discovery files | Filing #12 |
| Dr. Michael Roberts | Possibly same as Dr. Michael Robertson (name discrepancy); civil commitment examiner Aug 1, 2023 | Filing #12 (Exhibit B) |
| ggilbertson (unknown first name) | Username embedded in second-batch discovery image filenames; presumed evidence technician or photographer (Minnetonka PD or Hennepin County) | Filing #12 (Exhibits F–J) |
| G. Gilbertson | Photographer identified in discovery image filenames; reflection visible in Garage Photo 02 showing DSLR camera with external flash | Filing #12 (Exhibit L) |
| Aaron M. Schefter | Co-inventor, U.S. Patent D727,456S (Hexmag ammunition magazine design) | Filing #12 (Exhibit K) |
| Adam R. Schefter | Co-inventor, U.S. Patent D727,456S (Hexmag ammunition magazine design) | Filing #12 (Exhibit K) |
| Judge William H. Koch | Presiding Judge, Probate Mental Health Court (competency matters) | Filing #12 |
| Dr. Cranbrook | Rule 20.01 Evaluator (third evaluation; Dec 20, 2024 report) | Filing #12 |
| Dr. Martin Schuster | Guertin's California psychiatrist (since 2016); prescribes Adderall/Klonopin | Filing #12 |
| Judge Hudleston | Criminal case judge (replacing Judge Quam upon retirement) | Filing #12 |
| Vello Virkhaus | Owner, V Squared Labs; Guertin's former employer (2014–2020) | Filing #12 |
| Melinda K. Anderson | Official Court Reporter | Filing #12 |
| Tom Arneson | Assistant Hennepin County Attorney; appeared at Jan 16, 2024 hearing | Filing #12 |
| Amanda Prose | Patent attorney, Westman Champlin & Koehler; advised IC3.gov filing (Jan 6, 2023) | Filing #12 |
| Megan Neumann | Westman Champlin & Koehler; CC'd on Guertin–Prose emails | Filing #12 |
| Paul Debevec | USC ICT Graphics Lab researcher; allegedly connected to Netflix; subject of YouTube age discrepancy analysis | Filing #12 |
| Stephan Trojansky | Inventor on Netflix US Patent 11,810,254; filed 12 days after Guertin | Filing #12 |
| Jules Urbach | CEO, OTOY/Octane Render; referenced in YouTube fraud analysis | Filing #12 |
| Tom Daschle | Leader, InterMedia Advisors/Partners (Uptv parent); alleged Air Force ties | Filing #12 |
| Alan Sokol | InterMedia Advisors/Partners; alleged Netflix connections | Filing #12 |
| Jeremy Reiss | EVP, Henry Street Settlement; Fulbright Specialist with US State Department | Filing #12 |
| Dr. Casey Boland | Present during Dr. Rogstad's March 1, 2023 evaluation of Guertin | Filing #12 (Index 13) |
| Z. Peter Sawicki | WCK shareholder; terminated Guertin's attorney-client relationship Aug 10, 2023 | Filing #12 (Index 08) |
| Mark Lanterman | Computer Forensics (CompForensics.com); engaged for forensic hard drive analysis | Filing #12 (Index 09) |
| Dr. Schuster | Guertin's outpatient psychiatrist (California); Schuster Medical Research Institute | Filing #12 (Index 10) |
| Becky Schmidt | Case manager at Vail Place | Filing #12 (Index 10) |
| Ian Bearce | Head of Studio at Best Buy corporate; referred Guertin to DN Studios | Filing #12 (Index 08) |
| Robert Hulse | IP attorney at Fenwick & West; represents Netflix and Microsoft | Filing #12 (Index 09) |
| Judge John R. Tunheim (JRT) | U.S. District Judge, District of Minnesota — federal civil case 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM | Filing #12 |
| Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Mahoney (DLM) | U.S. Magistrate Judge, District of Minnesota — federal civil case 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM | Filing #12 |
| Magistrate Judge (DLM) | Assigned Magistrate Judge, federal case 0:24-cv-02646-JRT-DLM | Filing #12 |
| Hao Li | USC-ICT researcher / CEO of Pinscreen.com; federal declaration listing govt/military funding | Filing #12 (Exhibit A) |

---

*End of Trimmed Master Filing Catalog.*